As of July 2020, the content of this old version has been replaced with a new version.
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix, Version 4.0  
2.2.3 Data Requirements for Air Emissions/Off-Gases
Table of Contents


Predictive modeling may be useful in estimating emissions from a site or treatment system. An appropriate theoretical model is selected to represent the system (e.g., SVE treatment, incinerator, etc.), and site and contaminant information is used to estimate gross emissions. Because many variables affect emission rates, this approach is limited by the representativeness of the model and by the input used. This approach is usually used as a screening-level or pre-design evaluation. Site-specific data to support planning or technology selection activities (e.g., health risk assessments, pilot-scale studies) should be performed prior to actual implementation.

Emissions of VOCs and particulate matter during site disturbances, such as excavation, may be several orders of magnitude greater than the emission levels of an undisturbed site. The potential air emissions from the undisturbed and disturbed site must be understood before developing a site mitigation strategy. EPA has developed a systematic approach, called an Air Pathway Analysis (APA), for determining what air contaminants are present and at what level these compounds may be released into the atmosphere. The APA method is outlined in a four-volume series (Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series, EPA, 1989).

Emissions from treatment systems (e.g., SVE or incinerators, etc.) may be approximated by using soil contaminant concentrations and flow or throughput rate.

If the use of thermal combustion or certain oxidation systems is planned for off-gas treatment of extracted vapors, then an adequate supply of air/oxygen must be provided in order to operate these efficiently.

Information regarding the concentration and permeability/percent flow at discrete vertical intervals is extremely useful in optimized recovery from the regions of highest contaminant mass/removal potential. In other words, if 90% of the contaminant mass is being extracted from only 5% of the vertical interval, then off-gas treatment is biased by the large contribution of uncontaminated soil gas. Thus, changes in screened intervals, flow rates, mass transfer rates, and residual contaminant composition over time can dramatically affect off-gas treatment and should be evaluated.

Introduction Contaminants Treatments/Profiles References Appendices Navigation